## PChem Bonus Problems

As a TA for an undergraduate PChem class, I wrote a few "bonus" problems for students. These weren't graded; they were just extra ways for students to stretch their minds and test their knowledge. They are reproduced, with their answers, below.

And yes, I know that some of those graphics look awful. I haven't fixed up the CSS for this site to match that of the original site (which was hideously designed -- by me -- to match the color scheme of the Berkeley main page).

In class, Prof. Miller showed that the energy levels for different
potentials are spaced differently, and that the spacing is related to the
shape of the potential. Specifically, he showed that the particle in a box
energy levels become more widely spaced as the the energy level *n*
gets higher, that the harmonic oscillator energy levels are always evenly
spaced, and that the hydrogen atom energy levels become more closely spaced
as *n* increases.

The Morse potential is given by the equation:

It provides a relatively good approximation to a chemical bond. The
graph of *V(x)* is shown below (for *D* = *α* =
1):

How would you expect the energy levels to be spaced for small *n*?
What about for large *n*? Don't bother solving the Schrödinger
equation (even though it can be solved exactly for this potential); just
use your intuition. [Hint: For small *n*, consider energies less than
around -0.8. For large *n*, consider energies larger than -0.5.]

The point of this exercise is to take small sections of the Morse
potential and see how they compare to the potentials we know. For low
values of *n* (energies less than around -0.8 in the diagram) the
potential looks like this:

As you can see, this looks a like a slightly lopsided harmonic oscillator potential. Since the energy level spacing depends on the shape, we would expect the energy levels to be spaced about evenly (as with the harmonic oscillator). Since the anharmonicity (fancy word meaning "not shaped like a harmonic oscillator") makes it look a little like a hydrogen atom potential, we'd expect levels to get a little more closely spaced.

At higher energies, the Morse potential looks more like a hydrogen atom potential. For the hydrogen atom, we know that the energy levels get more closely packed together, so we would expect similar behavior in the high-energy Morse potential.

In class, Prof. Miller introduced the "rigid rotor harmonic oscillator" approximation for a diatomic molecule. This approximation assumes (among other things) that the vibrational motion can be separated from the rotational motion. This means that the total energy for the system is the sum of the vibrational energy and the rotational energy.

Prof. Miller also discussed that the spacing between vibrational energy
levels is substantially larger than the spacing between low rotational
energy levels. So for this bonus problem, we're going to explore that idea
in more detail. We'll use N_{2} as an example system. We were given
hν = 2360 cm^{-1} (that's also h-bar omega, which doesn't render
in HTML) and *B* = 2 cm^{-1}. Representing the states with the
vibrational quantum number *v* and the rotational quantum number
*J* by the ordered pair (*v*, *J*), we'll try to answer the
following questions:

- For a given vibrational state, how many rotational states have energy
less than the next vibrational state? That is, find
*J*such that the energy of the state (*v*,*J*) is greater than or equal to the energy of the state (*v*+ 1, 0). Note that since the vibrational energy level spacing is even (from the harmonic oscillator approximation), this will be the same for any vibrational level*v*. - After what rotational level does the rotational spacing become larger than the vibrational spacing?

Doing the math for these problems is a good start, but do think a little
about what it means physically. Compare these spacings to the average
thermal energy, about 200 cm^{-1} at room temperature. Would you
expect many molecules to be in excited vibrational states? What about
excited rotational states? (You'll learn how to quantify how many molecules
are expected to be in each state in 120B.)

First we'll figure out the spacing for the vibrational levels:

hν((

*v*+1)+1/2)- hν(*v*+1/2) = hνWe're looking for

*J*such that the energy of the rotational motion,*BJ*(*J*+ 1) is greater than or equal to hν. Since the rotational energy increases as*J*increases, we just need to find the value of*J*for which the energy is exact, and round up to the next integer. So we solve the quadratic equation:*BJ*(*J*+ 1) = hν

*BJ*^{2}+*BJ*- hν = 0

*J*= 1/2 (-1 + (1 + 4hν/B)^{1/2})where the positive root is chosen because

*J*must be positive. Plugging in numbers for N_{2}, we obtain*J*= 33.9, so the lowest physically meaningful*J*for which this is true is*J*= 34.As above, the vibrational energy spacing is hν. Now we need to find the rotational energy spacing; that is, the energy difference between the rotational state

*J*+ 1 and the rotational state*J*.E

_{J+1}-E_{J}=*B*(*J*+ 1)(*J*+ 2) -*BJ*(*J*+ 1) =*B*(*J*+ 1)((*J*+ 2) -*J*) = 2*B*(*J*+ 1)Setting this equal to hν and rearranging a bit, we obtain

*J*= (hν)/(2*B*) - 1. Plugging in the numbers for N_{2}, we find that*J*= 589.

When we compare the energy spacings to the thermal energy, we note that
the average thermal energy at room temperature is about a tenth of the
vibrational energy spacing, but is a hundred times the rotational energy
constant. The thermal energy would correspond to a rotational quantum
number of *J* = 9 or 10, substantially less than the *J* = 34 of
part 1.

As mentioned in the problem, the ratios of different states at a given
temperature can be calculated using techniques which you will learn in Chem
120B. For the vibrational distribution, you can see the calculation done on
page 742 of McQuarrie and Simon, which gives 1.31×10^{-5} as
the fraction in the first excited vibrational state, with nearly everything
else in the ground state.

The rotational states have a more interesting distribution. The details
of the calculation can be found on pages 744-748 of McQuarrie and
Simon (but be careful, because Prof. Miller defines *B* in a different
way than McQuarrie and Simon). The following graph plots the fraction of
molecules in the first few energy levels. As you can see, the peak is
around *J* = 6 or 7. A rotational quantum number of *J* = 34
would be extremely unusual at room temperature. In fact, it would
contribute a little less to the total population than the first excited
vibrational state does, since what actually determines the contribution is
the energy (and the energy for *J*=34 is a little higher than the
energy for *v*=1).

For a one-photon process, Prof. Yang showed that the selection rules are
ΔL = +/- 1 and ΔS = 0. In this bonus problem, we're going to
look at the transition from a hydrogen atom in its ground electronic
configuration (1s^{1}) to the excited state configuration
4p^{1} by consecutive single-photon processes.

You'll probably want to start out by listing all the possible
configurations between 1s^{1} and 4p^{1} (*e.g.*
2s^{1}, 2p^{1}, etc.) and finding term symbols for each of
those states (remember that p^{1} defines the term symbol, so
2p^{1} has the same term symbol as 3p^{1}, and so forth).
You may want to lay them out in a table: figure 8.4 (p. 307) and figure 8.5
(p. 308) might give you some ideas.

So the question for you to answer is: if you have 1 photon, how many
paths get you from 1s^{1} to 4p^{1}? How many paths are
there with 2 photons? What about 4 photons? 5? The real show-offs should
try 3 photons.